Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Adams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 1997No. DR94-12276; CA A93981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Husband filed a motion asking the trial court to set aside the judgment dissolving the parties’ 35-year marriage. ORCP 71B. Alternatively, he asked the court to terminate or reduce his spousal support obligation and to enter an order establishing conditions of visitation with his adult disabled son. The trial court denied husband’s motions to set aside the judgment, to terminate spousal support and to establish visitation with his disabled son but granted his motion to reduce the amount of the spousal support from $1,500 per month to $1,000 per month. We affirm.

Husband was served with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lovejoy Specialty Hospital, Inc. v. Advocates for Life, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. In re the Marriage of McKennaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. In re the Marriage of GilbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. In re the Marriage of Becker & MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Montoya v. Housing Authority of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Matchey v. Staffing Network Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. In re the Marriage of WeberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Montoya v. Housing Authority of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API