In re the Marriage of Owens
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
In this dissolution of marriage proceeding, wife appeals an order vacating a judgment against husband. She argues that the trial court abused its discretion under ORCP 71 B(l) in setting aside the judgment. We affirm.
In 1998, the parties filed a co-petition for dissolution of their marriage, using a preprinted form to which they attached documents. On the form signed by both parties, the preprinted provisions for spousal support were partially crossed out. In a combination of handwritten and preprinted language instead, the parties’ co-petition provides,
“[Husband] should be required to pay in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Thompson v. ConnellOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Cross v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Pacheco v. BlatchfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- In re the Marriage of WeaverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mary Ebel Johnson, P.C. v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- In Re the Marriage of CamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Benson v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- In re the Marriage of HousleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Bisaccio v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.