Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Owens

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 10, 2002No. 9804846 CV; A113449PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

In this dissolution of marriage proceeding, wife appeals an order vacating a judgment against husband. She argues that the trial court abused its discretion under ORCP 71 B(l) in setting aside the judgment. We affirm.

In 1998, the parties filed a co-petition for dissolution of their marriage, using a preprinted form to which they attached documents. On the form signed by both parties, the preprinted provisions for spousal support were partially crossed out. In a combination of handwritten and preprinted language instead, the parties’ co-petition provides,

“[Husband] should be required to pay in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Thompson v. ConnellOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Cross v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Pacheco v. BlatchfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. In re the Marriage of WeaverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mary Ebel Johnson, P.C. v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. In Re the Marriage of CamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Benson v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. In re the Marriage of HousleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Bisaccio v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API