City of Los Angeles v. Gager
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. D. K. Trask, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. William A. Alderson, and Elon G. Galusha, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Defendant was the owner of certain real estate lying between Central avenue and Naomi avenue, in the city of Los Angeles, through which the city, under and in accordance with the provisions of the street opening act of 1903, [Stats. 1903, p. 376], initiated proceedings to open Thirty-fifth street. Pursuant to ordinance duly passed, this action was instituted by the city attorney to condemn the land required for use in opening of said street. The complaint was filed therein and summons issued on June 16, 1905. On March 15, 1906, the referees appointed to ascertain and fix the compensation to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Phillips v. South Park CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- San José & Almaden Railroad v. MayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Tehama County v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Kashiwa v. ConeyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Dillenbeck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Los Angeles v. AitkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People Ex Rel. State Park Commission v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.