Legal Opinion
Lynip v. Alturas School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 13, 1915No. Civ. No. 1420PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
■ BUBNETT,
There is little, if any, controversy as to the facts involved herein. In the year 1911 one A. E. Pearson, as original contractor, was engaged in the construction of a grammar school building in the town of Alturas, Modoc County, under a written contract for the total price of $20,350. Defendants Auble, Ballard, and Smith were the trustees of the school district. On or about November 18th of said year said Pearson made application to the plaintiff, as cashier of the First National Bank of Alturas, for a loan of four thousand dollars, to enable said Pearson to pay for labor and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bagley v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Brand v. GodwinNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
- Lynip v. Alturas School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Sherwood v. WallinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Torbett v. EatonNew York Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Walters v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Classen v. WellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Lynip v. Alturas School Dist. of Modoc CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Lynip v. Alturas School District of Modoc CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Opinion No. (2002), California Attorney General Reports2002