Legal Opinion
Classen v. Weller
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 19, 1983No. Civ. 52304PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINBERG, J.
The builder (Classen) appeals from summary judgments 1 in favor of the developers Weller (Weller) and Hillsborough Development Corporation (HDC), and the broker, Fox & Carskadon (Fox), that denied relief on Classen’s cross-complaint for damages under the Cartwright and Sherman (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 16700 et seq., 15 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.) 2 antitrust acts.
On appeal, the major questions are whether Classen alleged compensable damages and is a member of the class.
For the reasons set forth below, we reverse with directions.
The Record
Weller, HDC and Fox denied every factual…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Caro v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Miller v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- BWI Custom Kitchen v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Morrison v. Viacom, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.