Legal Opinion

Proctor v. North Shore Partners, Inc.

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided September 23, 2002No. CIV.A.1999/032PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Gilbert Don Proctor (“appellant/cross-appellee” or “Proctor”) fell from a roof being constructed at the King’s Alley Arcade (“King’s Alley”) and brought an action for damages in the Territorial Court. Proctor sought to recover medical expenses, pain and suffering, impairment, disability, lost earnings and lost earning capacity. At the close of Proctor’s case, North Shore Partners, Inc. (“North Shore”), Development Consultants, Inc. (“Development”), and Parallel Construction Corporation (“Parallel”) (collectively referred to as “appellees”) moved for judgment as a matter of…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Toland v. Sunland Housing Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hood v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1986
  4. Sharkey v. Airco, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Munson v. DuvalDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. ChristianDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2005
  2. Miller v. Wingmark Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API