Fitzpatrick v. Cinitis
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
These three cases were tried together before the Superior Court and the jury and were argued together before, this court upon one finding of facts and upon identical claims of error. They will, therefore, be considered together in this opinion.
Numerous subsidiary facts may have been found by the jury. In so far as it is necessary to state them for a determination of the questions of law on these appeals, they are as follows: In the early morning of December 26th, 1924, the plaintiffs and others dined at a restaurant in Waterbury with and as the guests of the defendant. At about 2:00 a. m. all…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MoscaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Bishop v. CoppSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Hurlburt v. BussemeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Wolfe v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Dimon v. RomeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zullo v. ZulloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Craig v. DunleavySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- O'Connell v. McKeownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Warner v. LiimatainenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.