Legal Opinion
Zullo v. Zullo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 6, 1952PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiff had a $20,000 verdict in a negligence case. The defendant appealed from the denial of his motion to set aside the verdict and from the judgment.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts: Defendant and plaintiff are husband and wife. They were not getting along well. On Friday nights the plaintiff liked to go bowling with her girl friends. The defendant wanted the plaintiff to go out with him on the Friday night in question although she had been at home alone every other night of the week. She went out in a friend’s car. The defendant saw her and insisted that she…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kanopka v. KanopkaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Slabinski v. DixSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- L'Heureux v. HurleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Freedman v. HurwitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Birgel v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- McWilliams v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.