Legal Opinion
Dimon v. Romeo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 15, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Action to recover damages for a breach by the defendants of an alleged contract to purchase milk of the plaintiff, brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County and tried to the jury before Avery, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $6,077, and appeal by the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Upon the trial it was an admitted fact that on August 12th, 1919, a written contract was entered into and executed in the following terms, as a result of negotiations between the plaintiff and the defendant Domenico Romeo, who signed it as appears thereon.
“ This Agreement Witnesseth,
“ That The Romeo Farm by Dominick Romeo agrees to take the milk furnished by Bertha I. Dimon for a period of one year from date, the price to be the same paid by the Connecticut Milk Dealers Association and to call for the same each day and pay for the same each and every week. Bertha I. Dimon agrees to furnish…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kiely v. RagaliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Dubuque v. ComanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Lapenta v. LettieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Builders Supply Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Jennings v. EstesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1839
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- State v. BoucherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Callahan v. JursekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Butler v. Hyperion Theatre Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Hurlburt v. BussemeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.