Legal Opinion

Hurlburt v. Bussemey

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 8, 1924PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.

The plaintiffs seek a correction of the finding in many particulars, both by substituting a large number of the statements contained in their draft-finding for those contained in the finding by the court, and by adding thereto other paragraphs. Many of the statements of facts thus sought to be now incorporated in the finding are covered by the finding and its amendment, and many are not admitted or undisputed facts. Also a very large number of the paragraphs of the draft-finding sought to be incorporated in the finding set forth many of the deeds in the defendants’ chain of title to the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Huntington v. WhaleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
  2. President, Directors & Co. of the Mechanics Bank v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  3. Stevens v. SmokerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  4. State v. BuonomoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  5. Dubuque v. ComanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Falker v. SamperiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Shulman v. ShulmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  3. Robinson v. MyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  4. Knihal v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Banks v. WatrousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API