Legal Opinion

Seattle National Bank v. Emmons

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1897No. 2388PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. T. J. Humes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This was an action brought by respondent against the appellant and other defendants upon a promissory note. Service was had only upon R. W. Emmons, the case being dismissed as to H. H. Emmons; issues were formed and trial had as to R. W. Emmons and verdict rendered in favor of respondent; judgment followed, from which judgment an appeal is taken. The admitted facts are about as follows: In November 1894, the Commercial National Bank of Seattle held two promissory notes, one signed by R. W. Emmons (the appellant herein) and the *586other signed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. LowreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Yakima National Bank v. KnipeWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Riker v. CurtisAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  4. Watson v. ConwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Hoffman v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crutcher v. Scott Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. United States v. Skinner & Eddy CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1925
  3. Carr v. BonthiusWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Western Electric Co. v. Norway Pacific Construction & Drydock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Morehouse v. Spokane Security Finance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API