Legal Opinion

Riker v. Curtis

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendant from affirmance by the City Court, General Term, of a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action is to recover the amount of two loans made to the defendant by Jacob F. Wyckoff, onb of $400 on July 31, 1886, the other of $510 on August 16, 1886. The loans are evidenced by two checks drawn by Wyckoff to- the defendant, and by him indorsed, and, after payment by the bank, returned to Wyckoff as vouchers. *135It is conceded that the checks were not given on any debt owing to' the defendant, but in a transaction brought about by one Stilwell, then the attorney for the defendant. Stilwell wrote to Wyckoff, July 29, 1886, stating that his client had executed a deed to one Linus H.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hays v. . HathornNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Hooker v. . Eagle Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. Eno v. . CrookeNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. Bennett v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Rupp v. BlanchardNew York Supreme Court · 1861

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seattle National Bank v. EmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Costello v. DownerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. Laurencelle v. LaurencelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Morehouse v. Spokane Security Finance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Bernstein v. HorthAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API