Legal Opinion

Yakima National Bank v. Knipe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1893No. 823PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the cotfrt was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

This action was brought to recover the amount alleged to be due upon a certain promissory note made by the defendant Knipe to defendant Dorffel, and by him indorsed to the plaintiff. The defendant Knipe, in his' answer, after making certain general denials, set up two *349affirmative defenses and one affirmative partial defense. The first of said affirmative defenses was that the note had been altered after delivery, without his consent. The second was that the plaintiff was not the real party in interest. The partial defense was that a portion of…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pacific Drug Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. City of Fairhaven v. CowgillWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Kleeb v. BardWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Petty v. Hayden Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Seattle National Bank v. EmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API