State v. Finnerty
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
The issue before this court is when the prosecution, upon a proper discovery request, fails to furnish the defendant with the name of a known rebuttal witness, must the trial court exclude the testimony of the rebuttal witness?
Crim. R. 16 provides for discovery and inspection by either party in a criminal action.2 Crim. R. 16(B) imposes on the prosecutor a duty to disclose certain information upon a proper discovery request made by the defendant. Included in this rule is a provision for discovery of witness’ names, addresses, and records of felony convictions.
“Upon motion of the defendant,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- State v. HancockOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BeyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Rigby v. Lake CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. CassanoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. AhmedOhio Supreme Court · 2004
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.