Legal Opinion

Lattimore v. Merchants Fire Assurance Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 14, 1957No. 35693PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to recover from defendant under a personal property floater insurance policy which she carried with defendant for some ten years prior to the particular loss involved in this action. The policy was renewed in 1955 for a three-year period. The total amount of the policy was some $48,000; the particular items for which recovery is sought represent only a small percentage of the face amount.

Plaintiff, a collector of objects of art, has filed a claim for loss and damage on certain items of scheduled fine arts, including statuary, vases, dolls, bric-a-brac.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grace v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Mayfield v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Ætna Ins. v. Sacramento-Stockton S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  4. Coniglio v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  5. National Bank of D. O. Mills & Co. v. Union InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foote Mineral Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1959
  2. Lattimore v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  3. W. J. Boynton & Son, Inc. v. Ætna InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API