Legal Opinion

Lattimore v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 4, 1962No. Docket No. 85037Unpublished

Held: This Court has no jurisdiction to rule upon claims for refund for any year for which a deficiency has not been determined. Petitioner discovered in 1955 a claimed casualty loss, the insurance recovery on which was not determined until 1959. Held: petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the loss is deductible in 1956, the only year before us for which respondent has determined a deficiency.

1Opinion of the Court

Anne E. Lattimore v. Commissioner.

Lattimore v. Commissioner

Docket No. 85037.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1962-75; 1962 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 233; 21 T.C.M. (CCH) 393; T.C.M. (RIA) 62075;

April 4, 1962

Held: This Court has no jurisdiction to rule upon claims for refund for any year for which a deficiency has not been determined.

Petitioner discovered in 1955 a claimed casualty loss, the insurance recovery on which was not determined until 1959. Held: petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the loss is deductible in 1956, the only year before us for which respondent has determined a deficiency.

R…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dial v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  2. Merchants Fire Assurance Corporation v. Ann E. LattimoreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Diversified Services, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1961
  4. Lattimore v. Merchants Fire Assurance Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API