Chodos v. Cole
California Court of Appeal
1Dissent
TURNER, P. J., Dissenting.
I. INTRODUCTION
I would affirm. The record does not comply with requirements imposed in Supreme Court authority. And in my view the gravamen of the equitable indemnity cross-complaint are written and oral statements made in the course of litigation; all of these written and oral statements are subject to the litigation privilege; and as to one set of cross-defendants, equitable indemnity in the legal malpractice context is unavailable. I would dismiss the appeal from the amount of the attorney fee award entered in favor of cross-defendants, Michael D. Dempsey, Stephen…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.