Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Newak

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided December 14, 1982No. ACM 23544PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

Tried by general court-martial with the military judge sitting alone, the accused was convicted, despite her pleas, of wrongfully using, possessing and transferring marijuana, attempting to wrongfully possess and transfer a substance she believed to be amphetamines; sodomy, and conduct unbecoming an officer, in violation of Articles 80, 125, 133 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880, 925, 933, 934. The approved sentence extends to a dismissal, forfeiture of all pay and allow*543anees, and confinement at hard labor for six years.

I

At the outset, we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. LovettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. BruceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Van SteenwykU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. NewakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. PittsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. BruceU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. United States v. AccordinoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API