Legal Opinion

United States v. Bruce

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 21, 1984No. ACM 22899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW

KASTL, Senior Judge:

This case is before us for action consonant with the Court of Military Appeals decision in United States v. Bruce, 14 M.J. 254 (C.M.A.1982), and the follow-on mandate dated 7 September 1983. We affirm the accused’s conviction for attempted possession of quaalude, in violation of Article 80, U.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C. § 880, and we reas*1084sess the sentence in light of impermissible conditions of pretrial confinement.*

I

The first issue addressed by the Court of Military Appeals was:

WHETHER THE APPELLANT’S PRETRIAL CONFINEMENT FROM 14 FEBRUARY TO 29 APRIL…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  2. United States v. David Manley and Fluer WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. SuzukiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. BayhandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  5. United States v. NelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. PeacockU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. SmithU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. BelmontU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988
  4. United States v. SnyderU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API