United States v. Pitts
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
KASTL, Senior Judge:
In a court-martial, may the circumstances of uncontested and pled offenses be admitted on the merits when factually related to a contested offense? In the setting before us, we respond in the affirmative.
I
During the contested portion of the accused’s trial, the military judge permitted the prosecution to present evidence ordinarily reserved for pre-sentencing. The issue, which the defense brief challenges as involving a “fundamental and potentially wide-spread” abuse of procedure, arose in this setting: Technical Sergeant Pitts pled guilty to use and distribution…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. TrottierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. James Anthony VincentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. CiullaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. BrowningUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. OrostinU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. YeckinevichU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988