Legal Opinion

United States v. Pitts

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 18, 1984No. ACM 24096PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

In a court-martial, may the circumstances of uncontested and pled offenses be admitted on the merits when factually related to a contested offense? In the setting before us, we respond in the affirmative.

I

During the contested portion of the accused’s trial, the military judge permitted the prosecution to present evidence ordinarily reserved for pre-sentencing. The issue, which the defense brief challenges as involving a “fundamental and potentially wide-spread” abuse of procedure, arose in this setting: Technical Sergeant Pitts pled guilty to use and distribution…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. TrottierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. James Anthony VincentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. CiullaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  2. United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. BrowningUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. OrostinU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. YeckinevichU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API