In Re Gilbert P. Hyatt
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals (board) affirming the examiner’s rejection of claim 35, the sole claim in issue, under 35 U.S.C. § 112. We affirm.
Claim 35 reads:
35. A Fourier transform processor for generating Fourier transformed incremental output signals in response to incremental input signals, said Fourier transform processor comprising incremental means for incrementally generat ing the Fourier transformed incremental output signals in response to the incremental input signals. [Emphasis ours.]
This…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Application of Walter L. Borkowski and John J. Van VenrooyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Charles T. FuettererCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Lynn B. Wakefield and Frederick C. FosterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Marwan R. Kamal and Edgar R. RogierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re James A. Smith and James H. McLaughlin and Sterling Drug, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Walter C. Fiers v. Michel Revel and Pierre Tiollais v. Haruo Sugano, Masami Muramatsu and Tadatsugu TaniguchiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Utah Medical Products, Inc. v. Spectramed, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.