Legal Opinion
In re Hawkins
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided August 23, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 9023PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the board of appeals affirming the rejection of claims 2, 4-15, 17-25, 27, 29-31, 33-69 and 71-75, all of the claims remaining in appellant’s application.1
The Invention
Appellant’s invention concerns peroxy-amine compounds containing the following heterocyclic structural unit:
Claims 2, 8, 15 and 17 are sufficient to give an idea as to the types of compounds involved:
2. A compound of the formula
wherein Ri and R3 are alkyl of 1 to 10 carbon atoms and R2 and R4 are hydrogen, alkyl of 1 to 10 carbon atoms or aryl.
8. • A compound of the formula
where…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Application of Alfred Marzocchi and Richard C. HortonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Alexander D. Argoudelis, Clarence De Boer, Thomas E. Eble and Ross R. HerrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Gordon Henry Cook and Peter Arnold MerigoldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Roland Ralph Dileone and Howard Robert LucasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Jean Clement Louis FoucheCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re GlassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- In Re Robert L. LundakCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In re MottCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Evans Medical Ltd. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Advanced Semiconductor Materials America, Inc. v. Applied Materials, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.