Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Burrows v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1906No. 6283PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court, June 20, 1906, for a Avrit of prohibition directed to the superior court for Chehalis county, Chapman, J., to prevent the suspension of a prohibitory injunction pending appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

Application for a Writ of prohibition to prevent the suspension of a prohibitory injunction pending an appeal to this court. In December, 1905, the relators brought an action in the superior court of Chehalis county, to restrain the Grays Harbor Boom Company and the Hump-tulips Driving Company from injuring the relators’ land across which the Hnmjpftnlips river flows, .and from obstructing said river with logs. The complaint alleged, in substance, that the plaintiffs were the owners of certain lands across which the Humptulips river flows; that such lands were improved and .used by plaintiffs…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hovey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. State ex rel. Smith v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Rigney v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. In Re EpleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  5. Genet v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Tulare Irrigation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State ex rel. Pacific Reclamation Co. v. DuckerNevada Supreme Court · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API