Canada v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Lester Frank Canada (“Canada”) and Michael Smith (“Smith”) were accused of jointly participating in two armed robberies. They were tried together in separate jury trials for each robbery and convicted of multiple crimes incident to each robbery. Their appeals from these convictions were ordered consolidated for oral argument.
Canada and Smith challenge their convictions for the robbery of the Sit ’N Bull lounge in Las Vegas on two grounds. First, Canada and Smith contend that the shotguns that they used in the robbery should not have been introduced into evidence because they were the…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. ThiretSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Daly v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- Bolin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Mortensen v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1999
- Fields v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Alejandre v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MackOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.