Legal Opinion

State v. Mack

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1997No. S-96-004PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grey, Judge.

This is an appeal from the Sandusky County Court of Common Pleas. After a denial of his motion to suppress, defendant-appellant Sheridan Mack entered a no contest plea to a charge of drug abuse. He was found guilty, sentenced to an eighteen-month suspended sentence, and took this appeal designating one assignment of error.

“The trial court committed error prejudicial to the Defendant Appellant when it denied his motion to suppress the evidence since the evidence was seized in an unconstitutional, warrantless search and seizure of his personal possessions, which was not supported by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. Walter George Strickland, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Harve D. Mason and Pat J. Mason v. Ralph J. Pulliam (Special Agent/intelligence Division, Irs) and Jim Kelly(supervisor/intelligence Division, Irs)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cavanagh v. GrasmickDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  2. State v. GomezOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. MoscosoOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. Damron, 06ca-150 (10-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. PraterOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API