United States v. Schrock
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
MAHONEY, Judge:
Two of the three assigned errors concern the post-trial review of the staff judge advocate:
I
THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE ERRED BY INCLUDING IN HIS POST-TRIAL REVIEW, INFORMATION THAT THE ACCUSED USED DRUGS WHILE ENROLLED IN THE DRUG REHABILITATION PROGRAM.
II
THE REVIEWER’S FAILURE TO INFORM THE SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY OF HIS OPTION TO SUSPEND THE BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE CONSTITUTES ERROR.
Against these assigned errors we juxtapose the entire Goode response of the trial defense counsel:
1. I have reviewed the record of trial, Staff Judge Advocate’s post trial review and clemency…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. BostonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. SchmenkU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. DudleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. ThompsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. AccordinoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. JonesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. AubinU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.