United States v. Boston
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION UPON RECONSIDERATION
EARLY, Chief Judge:
We have reconsidered this case on our own motion to clarify certain language in our initial opinion.1 United States v. Boston, 7 M.J. 953 (A.F.C.M.R. 3 July 1979). There we held that:
where the defense counsel has submitted comments on the review of the staff judge advocate, it is incumbent upon the staff judge advocate, prior to submission of the review to express his opinion — agreeing or disagreeing — on *955the validity of such comments. See United States v. Redding, 6 M.J. 660 (A.F.C.M.R.1978); United States v. Lehman, 5 M.J. 740, 743 n.3…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. StockmanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1975
- United States v. BostonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. JohnstoneU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. MarklandU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. PowisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. SchrockU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. BlodgettU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. RodriquezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. AubinU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.