Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Dudley

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 7, 1985No. ACM S26819PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

At trial the appellant moved to suppress evidence uncovered during a search of his off-base quarters and a statement he subsequently gave law enforcement officials. After the trial judge ruied against him, he pleaded guilty to wrongful use and distribution of marijuana.

The appellant now suggests that his plea was improvident because the military judge failed to advise him that his guilty plea waived appellate review of the denial of the motion to suppress his confession and the contraband discovered in his house. In his Goode1 response to the staff judge…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. ForbesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. SchrockU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. BaileyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. GilchristArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  2. United States v. McPhaulU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  3. United States v. ThomasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. HodgeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  5. United States v. HudsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API