Legal Opinion

United States v. Stephen J. Eide

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 30, 1989No. 19-15165PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

Stephen Eide appeals his convictions for various drug-related crimes on the grounds that the district court erroneously denied his Motion to Suppress. On appeal, Eide argues that statements he made to hospital personnel while being treated at a VA emergency room should be suppressed because he was not given his “Miranda rights” and because the statements were involuntary. Eide makes similar arguments with respect to statements he made to the FBI eleven days later. Finally, Eide argues that 42 U.S.C. § 290ee-3 requires the suppression of his urinalysis results and some…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Arturo Gonzalez-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. BrobstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. M.A.K. v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. United States v. Constance F. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. LonetreeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API