Legal Opinion

Scheel v. Tremblay

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1973No. Appeal, 1007PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

This is an appeal from an order granting appellee’s motion for a summary judgment. Appellants contend that the court below erred in granting the motion because the issues of appellee’s negligence and the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries were jury questions.

On July 19, 1972, at 9:40 p.m., defendant-appellant (hereinafter Tremblay) was driving his automobile in an easterly direction on Scottsdale Road in Lansdowne, Pa. at a speed not in excess of the posted limit. Plaintiff-appellant (hereinafter Scheel) and her husband were passengers in the Tremblay vehicle.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Stern v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Nelson v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Wood Ex Rel. Putnam v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. LumpkinMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  2. McMillan v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Smith v. Acme Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. Grainy Ex Rel. Grainy v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Laabs v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API