Legal Opinion
Laabs v. Southern California Edison Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 20, 2009No. E044917PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Amanda Laabs was a passenger in a car that collided with another car in an intersection and then struck a light pole installed and owned by defendant Southern California Edison Company (SCE). Laabs sued various *1264parties, including SCE and Edison International (Edison), for damages. Relative to SCE and Edison, Laabs alleged that these defendants were negligent and proximately caused her injuries by placing and maintaining the light pole too close to the curb. SCE and Edison moved for summary judgment on the ground that they owed no duty of care to Laabs…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Erikson v. NunninkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Grotheer v. Escape Adventures, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.