Nash v. Baun
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBossman, J.
The questions presented to us arise upon a demurrer to the complaint. The demurrer is based upon the contention that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. It alleges that defendant Baun was the owner of a Ford tonring car kept by him for the purpose of letting it for hire, and that May 2, 1925, Bay Stalmaker and Harold Dickenson, whom we shall hereafter refer to as the “renters,” applied to Baun for the use of the car. The complaint alleges that Baun agreed to hire the car to the renters and sent one Johnson with the automobile as a driver. Continuing,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Geiss v. Twin City Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Collard v. BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Dalrymple v. Covey Motor Car Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Thomas v. Lockwood Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Doherty v. Hazelwood Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Covey Drive Yourself & Garage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Kernin v. City of CoquilleOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- French v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Fleming v. Ambulance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Wyckoff v. Mutual Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1944