Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wyckoff v. Mutual Life Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1944Published

1Dissent

The plaintiff as named beneficiary in a policy of life insurance brings this action against the defendant company to recover under a double indemnity provision for the alleged accidental death of the insured. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant company, and the plaintiff appeals.

By the terms of the policy the defendant company agreed that in the event of the death of the insured from natural causes it would pay to the plaintiff beneficiary the sum of $5000. It was further agreed that double indemnity, to-wit, $10,000, would be payable

"* * * upon receipt of due proof that the…

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. Travellers' Insurance v. McConkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Del Vecchio v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API