Legal Opinion

Covey Drive Yourself & Garage v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1937PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBossman, J.

Upon the ground that the complaint failed to state a cause of suit the circuit court sustained the defendants ’ demurrer. The propriety of that action is the sole issue before us.

Omitting mention of all matters immaterial to the controversy before us, the complaint alleges that the plaintiff is engaged in the City of Portland in the business of renting automobiles without drivers; that its lessees drive its cars “upon the highways of the States of Oregon, Washington, Idaho and California, and none of the motor vehicles so owned by the plaintiff are for use exclusively within the corporate…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. GrosjeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Salt Lake City v. KusseUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Owen v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Reeves, Com'r of Revenue v. Wright TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  5. Salt Lake City v. KusseUtah Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API