Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Specialty Foam Products, Inc. v. Keet

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1979No. 10629PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

This is an original action in prohibition, commenced by the relator as defendant in an action pending in the Circuit Court of Greene County. The relator’s ground for seeking prohibition was that the procedure followed in commencing the action by attachment, or more accurately garnishment in aid of attachment, did not comport with the requirements of procedural due process as first articulated by the Supreme Court of the United States in Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 89 S.Ct. 1820, 23 L.Ed.2d 349 (1969), and subsequently developed in Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Palmer ex rel. Palmer v. GoekeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. Robinson v. CrouchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Board of Public Utilities v. CrowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. STATE EX REL. BD. OF PUB. UTILITIES OF CITY OF SPRINGFIELD v. CrowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. State ex rel. Grimes v. AppelquistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API