Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Robinson v. Crouch

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1981No. 12003PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Judge.

Plaintiff Carol petitioned this court to prohibit the defendant circuit judge from enforcing his rulings which would require plaintiff to produce certain documents and answer certain interrogatories regarding her earnings, assets, etc., in an action instituted by her former husband, Gary, designed to modify a previously made dissolution of marriage decree. 1 The gist of plaintiff’s claim for prohibition is that defendant has no jurisdiction in the cause to modify the decree and hence no jurisdiction to make or enforce the discovery rulings. Our preliminary order in prohibition…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Boll v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Lightfoot v. JenningsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. State Ex Rel. Lambert v. FlynnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. In Re Marriage of HaggardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. Block v. BlockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lueckenotte v. LueckenotteSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  2. Kent v. Charlie Chicken, II, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. Marlo v. HessMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Gaunt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. LAKE OSAGE CONDOMINIUM ASS'N v. PrewittMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API