Legal Opinion

Tuinstra v. Lynema

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1954No. Docket 47; Calendar 46,177PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained as a guest passenger in an automobile driven by Ms brother-in-law, defendant Lynema, when the latter undertook to pass the automobile of defendant Campbell and collided head on with one driven by defendant Soop and owned by defendant Standard Oil Company. Defendants’ motions for directed verdict, judgment non obstante veredicto, and new trial were denied, the jury returning a verdict for plaintiff of $30,799.78 against defendants Lynema, Soop and Standard Oil Company, who appealed from judgment thereon, and for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wright v. HakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Price v. WesternMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Kocks v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Cain v. EnyonMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Samuelson v. Olson Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peyton v. DelnayMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Brooks v. HaackMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Emons v. ShiraefMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Romine v. ClevelandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Emons v. ShiraefMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API