Legal Opinion

Potterton v. Ryland Group, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 19, 1981No. [No. 44, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavidson, J.

On 3 January 1973, the petitioners, Richard Lee and Mary G. Potterton (buyers), entered into a contract with the respondent, the Ryland Group, Inc. (seller), to purchase a house to be built by the seller. The contract expressly provided that the seller would construct the house "in a workmanlike manner substantially in accordance with plans and specifications.” Settlement took place on 26 December 1973.

At various times before and after settlement, and as late as 6 December 1974, the buyers discovered construction defects that they reported to the seller. Approximately seven months later, on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mayor of Federalsburg v. Allied Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Oliver v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1827
  3. H & R BLOCK, INC. v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Hall v. BarlowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Nardo v. FavazzaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Midland Funding, LLC v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. Booth Glass Co. v. Huntingfield Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Antigua Condominium Ass'n v. Melba Investors Atlantic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Chaille Dubois v. Atlas Acquisitions LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  5. Diamond v. T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API