Legal Opinion

Booth Glass Co. v. Huntingfield Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 2, 1985No. 25, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

The question presented in this case is whether the three-year Statute of Limitations, Maryland Code (1974, 1984 Repl.Vol.), § 5-101 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, is tolled during the pendency of a defendant’s efforts to repair negligently installed glasswork in a building. 1

I

On May 1, 1975, Huntingfield Corporation (Huntingfield) contracted with a general contractor, Joseph A. Campbell, Jr. (Campbell), to construct an addition to a building on property owned by Huntingfield. Booth Glass Company, Inc. (Booth), one of Campbell’s subcontractors, installed…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Waldman v. RohrbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Hecht v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Litz v. Maryland Department of the EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Arroyo v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Shailendra Kumar, P.A. v. DhandaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Murphy v. MerzbacherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API