Booth Glass Co. v. Huntingfield Corp.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
The question presented in this case is whether the three-year Statute of Limitations, Maryland Code (1974, 1984 Repl.Vol.), § 5-101 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, is tolled during the pendency of a defendant’s efforts to repair negligently installed glasswork in a building. 1
I
On May 1, 1975, Huntingfield Corporation (Huntingfield) contracted with a general contractor, Joseph A. Campbell, Jr. (Campbell), to construct an addition to a building on property owned by Huntingfield. Booth Glass Company, Inc. (Booth), one of Campbell’s subcontractors, installed…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Waldman v. RohrbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Hecht v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Litz v. Maryland Department of the EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Arroyo v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Shailendra Kumar, P.A. v. DhandaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Murphy v. MerzbacherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.