Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Southern Pac. Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 11, 1953No. 31146PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter concerns the motion of defendant to disallow the sum of $258.60 for one-half of the daily transcript, which was allowed as one item of the costs by the Clerk of the Court. This was an action by the employee against the employer under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U. S.C.A. § 51 et seq. The trial started on a Monday morning and the verdict of the jury for $25,000 in favor of plaintiff was returned at Friday noon of the same week. The taking of testimony began on Monday afternoon and was' finished Thursday noon, or a total of three days. At the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Department of Highways v. McWilliams Dredging Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1950
- Stallo v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Kenyon v. Automatic Instrument Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1950
- Gotz v. Universal Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bank of America v. Loew's International CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- A.B.C. Packard, Inc., a Corporation v. General Motors Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Prashker v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1959
- Clapper v. Original Tractor Cab CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1958
- Gillam v. A. Shyman, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1962