Legal Opinion
Gillam v. A. Shyman, Inc.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided November 16, 1962No. Civ. No. A-14484PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGE, Chief Judge.
At the conclusion of the plaintiffs ease upon trial of this action the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss,1 with costs allowed to defendants pursuant to Rule 54(d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Separate cost bills were filed on behalf of the defendants A. Shyman, Inc., Russell Eddy and Joseph Hart and on behalf of the defendants K & L Distributors and Irving Ziegman. The Clerk, upon a hearing on the matter of taxation of costs, entered an order taxing against plaintiff certain items of cost, disallowing others, and requesting resubmission of other items as…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Perlman v. FeldmannDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
- McWilliams Dredging Co. v. Department of Highways of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Harris v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Department of Highways v. McWilliams Dredging Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1950
- Bank of America v. Loew's International CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sperry Rand Corp. v. A-T-O, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
- Fressell v. AT & T Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
- Federal Savings & Loan Ins. Corporation v. SzarabajkaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
- Frederick v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995
- Esler v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.