Legal Opinion
Gotz v. Universal Products Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 12, 1943No. 1068PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
Defendant seeks allowance of costs in a certain patent suit tried before Judge Nields in this court. The patent was held invalid. D.C., 22 F.Supp. 215. The Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit affirmed. 107 F.2d 40.
The parties asked the court to sit in at the informal argument before Edward G. Pollard, Clerk of this Court, and to give the Clerk the court’s views on the various items making up defendant’s bill of costs so that the parties could dispense with a review by the court under Rule 54 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
I,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Appliance Inv. Co. v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Transit Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Starr Piano Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co. v. Beckwith Machinery Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
- T. H. Symington & Son, Inc. v. Symington Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Marrian Kolesar and Andrew Kolesar, Her HusbandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Garriga v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
- Specialty Equipment & MacHinery Corp. v. Zell Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Kaiser Industries Corp. v. McLouth Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1970
- William C. Euler v. Nancy Lee Waller, a Minor, by Her Guardian, Robert Lewis McCollarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.