Legal Opinion

Doe v. Roe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2005No. 30474PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

John Doe (Husband) appeals from a magistrate court decision that denied his petition to terminate John Roe’s (Father) parental rights to Baby Doe and to allow Husband to adopt the child.

i.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Husband was married to Baby Doe’s mother (Mother) when Baby Doe was born and, as a result, Husband was shown as the father on Baby Doe’s birth certificate and Baby Doe was given Husband’s last name. Husband and Mother lived together for several years with Baby Doe and another child born to Husband and Mother although, ultimately, a divorce action was filed.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Thomson v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Opportunity, L.L.C. v. OssewardeIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Roe Family Services v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Woodburn v. Manco Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re the Adoption of A.A.T.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Jane Doe (13-23) v. John DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Doe v. Idaho Department of Health and WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API