Legal Opinion

Doe v. Idaho Department of Health and Welfare

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2013No. 40670PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

A biological father challenges a magistrate judge’s order “nonestablishing” his parental rights. On appeal, he contends that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing at which to prove that he was a “parent” as defined by I.C. § 16-2002(11).

II.Factual and Procedural Background

Doe is the biological father of a baby boy (“Son”). Doe was in prison when Son was born. Son’s mother (“Mother”) was living with another man (“Boyfriend”), and Son was given Boyfriend’s surname. In April of 2011, Son was placed in the custody of the Idaho Department of Health and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. DiazIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. RadfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Matthew Elliot CohaganIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. LeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  3. John Doe I and Jane Doe I v. Jane DoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API