Legal Opinion

Roe Family Services v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2004No. 29781, 29788, 30010PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This ease involves an appeal from a district court order reversing a decree of parental termination issued by a magistrate judge. The magistrate judge’s decree of termination terminated the natural father, John Doe’s (the Father), parental rights to Baby Boy Doe and granted custody to the proposed adoptive parents John and Jane Roe (the Roes). The Appellants in this case are Roe Family Services (RFS), Baby Boy Doe’s natural mother, Jane Doe (the Mother), and the Roes. The Father is the Respondent.

On December 7, 2001, the Mother informed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tanner v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Nicholls v. BlaserIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Koester v. KoesterIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Stockwell v. StockwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hawkins v. HawkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Roe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In Re Adoption of DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API