Weaver v. Bank of Bowersville
Supreme Court of Georgia
Petition for injunction. Before Judge Meadow. Hart superior court. - January 31, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
A motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions having been duly presented, it is essential first to pass upon that motion, since it raises a question of jurisdiction. The motion is based on the ground that the sheriff, “one of the parties defendant in said case, was never served with a copy of the bill of exceptions, . . never waived or acknowledged service on said bill,” citing as authority the case of Haines v. Clary, 66 Ga. 519, where it was held that the sheriff was a necessary party, in a similar case, and not having been served with the bill of exceptions, the writ of error was dismissed.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Whatley v. BarkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Moseley v. RamboSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Quitman Oil Co. v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Haines v. Clary & WhaleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Towson v. HornSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Sharpe v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Chapman v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933