Legal Opinion

Davis-Pickett Chevrolet, Inc. v. Collier

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 27, 1962No. 39693PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

There is no merit in the general grounds of the motion for new trial.

In ground 4 error is assigned on a portion of the charge dealing with implied warranties in connection with the sale of personalty. Since it was a contention of the seller here that the exchange of a motor block was made after expiration of the warranty period, as contained in the express warranty, under circumstances related in the statement of facts above, and purchaser contended that the motor did not perform properly because of the condition of the substituted block, there was no error in charging on the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lamon v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Leggett v. BrewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Southeastern Greyhound Lines Inc. v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  4. Padgett v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  5. O'Donnelly v. StaplerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. GunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Jacobson v. Benson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Southern Concrete Products Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Neuman v. Spector Wrecking & Salvage Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. National Casualty Company v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API