Legal Opinion

People v. McDonnell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 19, 1995No. 95SA171PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent converted funds belonging to clients of his law firm. He was immediately suspended from the practice of law in 1994, pending resolution of these proceedings. C.R.C.P. 241.8. The parties entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommended that the respondent be disbarred. An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the conditional admission and recommended that the respondent be disbarred, that the effective date of disbarment not be retroactive to the date of immediate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. LujanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. People v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. EbbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. McDonnell v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API