Legal Opinion

People v. Ebbert

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 1996No. 96SA312PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct, C.R.C.P. 241.18, the respondent in this lawyer discipline case has consented to disbarment. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission including the recommendation of disbarment. We accept the conditional admission and order that the respondent be disbarred.

I

The respondent was admitted to the Colorado bar in 1981. He was suspended from the practice of law for thirty days on May 2, 1994, effective thirty days thereafter, for neglect of a legal matter and use of cocaine.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. People v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. People v. EbbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. CarterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  2. People v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. People v. CohenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  4. People v. RitlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  5. People v. CarwinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API