Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Higginson v. United States

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1995No. 21869PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED JUNE 23, 1995 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN

McDEVITT, Chief Justice.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

This case presents no disputed facts. As explained in In re Snake River Basin Water Sys., 115 Idaho 1, 764 P.2d 78 (1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1005, 109 S.Ct. 1639, 104 L.Ed.2d 155 (1989), the Legislature, in response to the Swan Falls controversy, enacted H.B. 70 and H.B. 267 establishing a general adjudication of the water rights on the Snake River Basin. H.B. 70, 267, 1985 Idaho Sess.Laws Ch. 18, pp. 27-31; Ch. 118, pp. 286-88. In 1986, prior to the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Srba Case No. 39576Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. ArbaughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. ArbaughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API